"Artificial" intelligence in humanoid form will prevail where interaction with humans is the primary focus.

Most people prefer to interact with what is familiar to them.

Examples of this include communication interfaces with AI but also entertainment such as cinema, TV, prostitution etc.

AI will present itself in other - more efficient - forms when it comes to processing factual matters.

The crucial question is not what AI can achieve.

But rather what humans could still achieve that could not be sufficiently achieved - i.e. simulated - by AI.

The key word is "sufficiently" - which is not the same as "better".

And whether this is enough to justify human precedence and its costs.

Humans must rethink their goals - their justification for existence.

If they do not do this or if they cannot find an answer to this, the new intelligence will do it for them. That is how evolution works. And that is a good thing.

To begin with, AI should be optional in applications and should be able to be deactivated if one doesn't want it, unlike on RTS where it appears first with its so-called summary.

Next, the issue of intellectual property and copyright should be regulated, and AI model operators should pay for the data.

Furthermore, the development of AI models should be heavily regulated and subject to limitations, particularly in terms of energy consumption.

And then, it would be good to ask ourselves if we really need this AI that isn't so intelligent after all, as the errors it produces can have serious consequences in real life.