Of course, there cannot be unlimited immigration. No country allows that. We need effective and clear immigration rules. The advantages of manageable immigration are well known to us all. Nota bene, emigration as well. Many of our ancestors were very grateful for the willingness of other countries to take them in.

Much more useful than sweeping claims that immigration harms or benefits - the truth always lies somewhere in between - would be the joint search for feasible control mechanisms. Total isolation at 10 million is just as wrong as uncritically opening borders. It's not about gaining party-political advantages from the difficult situation. Once again, it's about finding and implementing sensible solutions.

Let me make this clear from the start: I am neither opposed to immigration nor do I have anything to do with the People's Party. However, the fact remains that more people require more of everything: housing, energy, food, etc., and naturally immigration also goes hand in hand with traffic growth; denying this is pointless. But it is more than obvious that certain political circles - ironically exactly those who support immigration - want to freeze infrastructure and prevent any expansions; otherwise objections wouldn't be filed wholesale against every little road, wind turbine, barn, etc. In other words: they stubbornly refuse to solve the problems arising from "immigration". Since voters - as seen on 25.11.24 - apparently see it the same way, there's only one alternative; namely to solve the problems that arise from "no immigration", which will be very, very much more difficult. "Thank you letters" - as so often - please address to the Greens....🤔🥱🤪🤣