The law was coldly circumvented by real estate speculation, to the detriment of the local population, who are essentially the only legitimate inhabitants of the respective communities. The legal text was provided with so many loopholes by those who are now profiting massively that, in the end, practically nothing has improved; on the contrary. The interviewed owner of a second home in Flims reacted very borderline to the question of whether he felt guilty towards the actual population of the village, which almost has arrogant characteristics. What must a family from Flims in acute housing need think when they have to hear this clearly selfishly arguing retiree from the lowlands? - Can he still encounter the family in the village shop with the same lightheartedness after this interview, without blushing?

The Second Home Initiative and the legal text apparently need a revision to close the majority of loopholes.

Just let the campers camp. Because preventing it neither works nor helps anything. I estimate that every 10th person also shops in the region where they're allowed to stay. Artificial pitches annoy me because I want to stand alone and certainly won't pay 25 francs for a pitch that offers nothing. My camper is absolutely self-sufficient - I don't need electricity, I have a permanently installed toilet, shower, etc. I don't need anything, just my peace and quiet. That's why I'm also a camper. If you want to regulate something, then please send all those without PERMANENTLY INSTALLED toilets and rubbish bins to the campsite. Because all those who camp like I do don't bother anyone either. I stay maximum one night in one place and then I move on, and nothing is left behind when I leave. I often have pleasant conversations with locals, who often even allow me passage through no-driving zones. With that in mind, I wish you a lovely evening.